Retired course
This course has been retired and is no longer supported.
About this lesson
The practice of identifying positive and negative conditions that may occur within the project and impact project objectives.
Exercise files
Download this lesson’s related exercise files.
Risk Identification.docx61.7 KB Risk Identification - Solution.docx
61.7 KB
Quick reference
Risk Identification
The practice of identifying positive and negative conditions that may occur within the project and impact project objectives.
When to use
As soon as the Project Charter has been prepared and the project boundary conditions are determined, risk identification should start. Initially it is based upon the project assumptions. As project planning begins, areas of uncertainty in the plan are risks. Once the project progresses to execution, the project Core Team should be regularly identifying risks based upon what they have seen occur on the project. Risk identification does not end until the project is complete.
Instructions
There are many techniques that can be used for risk identification. What is most important is that you are doing it. The techniques just aid the Core Team to identify risks that they may have overlooked. The techniques include:
-
Expert judgment – each Core Team member should apply their experience to identify risks
-
Project documentation reviews – gaps and uncertainty in documents such as Project Charter, requirements documents, and project plans
-
Information gathering – interviews and Delphi techniques are used to gather information for subject matter experts not on the team
-
Check lists and databases – lessons learned experiences from other projects are often codified in checklists and databases
-
Assumptions testing – considering the impact to the project if a planning assumption is not valid, or only partially valid
-
Diagramming techniques – Pre-morten diagram is used to identify possible causes that could create a positive or negative impact to the project, swim lane diagram is used to identify possible organizational handoff risks within the project
-
SWOT analysis – strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats – construct to consider from several points of view what may happen on the project.
Definition of Risk Identification Process: "The process of identifying individual risks as well as sources of overall risk and documenting their characteristics. "PMBOK® Guide
This definition is taken from the Glossary of the Project Management Institute, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., 2017.
Login to download
- 00:04 Hi, I'm Ray Sheen.
- 00:06 Let's talk now about some techniques you can use to identify projects risk.
- 00:12 The project management body of knowledge, the PMBOK Guide,
- 00:15 defines risk identification as the process of identifying individual risks
- 00:19 as well as sources of overall risk and documenting their characteristics.
- 00:24 As we discuss this topic, I wanna emphasis the importance of identifying
- 00:28 all possible risks on your project.
- 00:31 Our next step will be the filter and prioritize those risks, but
- 00:34 right now we want to identify them.
- 00:36 So don't drop anything from your list of potential risks at this time.
- 00:40 You don't wanna eliminate an important risk too early in
- 00:43 the process by just assuming it away.
- 00:45 Let the risk analysis step tell you which ones to eliminate.
- 00:49 Some of the tools for risk identification include expert judgement,
- 00:53 documentation reviews that look for aspects of the project chartering and
- 00:57 requirements documents with gaps or
- 00:59 uncertainty, information gathering reviews with experts and experienced individuals.
- 01:04 Checklist and
- 01:04 databases that have been built based upon experience from other previous projects.
- 01:09 Assumptions testing that checks projects and business assumptions,
- 01:13 there are several diagramming techniques, and then finally,
- 01:16 a SWOT analysis strength, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.
- 01:20 Use any or all of these techniques to help you identify possible risks.
- 01:25 I'd like to go into a little bit depth about several of the techniques that I
- 01:27 found to be more helpful.
- 01:30 One of these is the information gathering interviews.
- 01:33 This could be done with internal people from similar projects or external experts.
- 01:37 When interviewing internal people, try to find individuals who've had experience on
- 01:41 projects, they'll be similar to the characteristics of your project.
- 01:45 Now when interviewing external people, search for
- 01:47 those with demonstrative best practices.
- 01:50 Be careful not to ask them to compromise confidential or proprietary information.
- 01:55 Ask them what worked well and why, and ask them what went wrong, and why.
- 01:59 The interviewee may be reluctant to discuss or admit their mistakes.
- 02:04 People don't like to talk about what they've done wrong, so
- 02:07 be gentle with them at this point.
- 02:09 Reassure them that you're just there to learn not to condemn.
- 02:12 And they typically remember a couple of the big issues on the project,
- 02:16 you may have to dig deep to identify these second and third tier risks.
- 02:20 You should also be sure to ask questions that address all three
- 02:23 sides of the project management triangle, scope, schedule, and resources or budget.
- 02:28 The next technique I'd like to discuss is assumptions testing.
- 02:32 This is a great technique to use whenever your project has high uncertainty.
- 02:36 It starts by identifying all the assumptions, hypothesis, and
- 02:39 scenarios that were used to create the initial charter documents.
- 02:43 We've discussed the W's of project initiation, what, why, when, who,
- 02:47 where, and how.
- 02:48 There are often assumptions embedded in the answers to each of these.
- 02:52 Check the validity of the assumption.
- 02:54 This often changes over time, so something that was not a risk at the beginning of
- 02:58 the project may become one, or vice versa.
- 03:01 By the way, it's okay if the assumption is wrong.
- 03:04 Just recognize it and re-plan based upon the actual assumption.
- 03:08 Don't stick with the wrong assumption just because you're afraid to change.
- 03:11 You also wanna identify which assumptions are highly sensitive.
- 03:15 What I mean by that is,
- 03:16 if changing that assumption could have a big impact on the project.
- 03:20 If there's sensitivity, that assumption is at risk.
- 03:23 No sensitivity, no risk.
- 03:25 Finally, consider the clarity of the assumption.
- 03:28 Is it accurate, stable, and consistent?
- 03:31 And is that assumption completely defined?
- 03:33 If you can't answer yes to all those questions,
- 03:35 then there's a risk in that assumption.
- 03:37 One of my favorite approaches to identifying risks is to use diagramming
- 03:41 techniques.
- 03:42 With a diagram, I can see potential threats and
- 03:44 opportunities that would otherwise be overlooked.
- 03:47 Also it's a great way for the team to explain the risk to each other.
- 03:51 The first technique is a pre-mortem.
- 03:53 You may be familiar with the term post-mortem,
- 03:56 that's what the doctors do to analyze why someone has died.
- 03:59 A pre-morterm is what we will do to time hypothesize why a project might fail.
- 04:04 I use a fishbone or Ishikawa diagram to map the potential reasons.
- 04:08 Start with major project problem that would constitute a project failure,
- 04:12 such as a major schedule delay.
- 04:14 I then brainstorm with my core team what potential issues
- 04:18 could create that condition.
- 04:20 I do the same thing for a large overrun or
- 04:22 rejection of a deliverable by the customer.
- 04:25 All of the bones that are identified are risks to be analyzed.
- 04:29 Also, I found that this is the best technique for identifying positive risks.
- 04:33 I start diagram with the result of, say, how do we finish three months early?
- 04:37 And then ask what would need to happen for that to occur?
- 04:41 The other diagramming technique is called a Swim Lane chart.
- 04:44 This maps the project activities in sequence through the primary functions or
- 04:48 departments that will do the work.
- 04:50 On large complex projects, there's often a miscommunication or
- 04:54 delay when project work is handed from one department to another.
- 04:58 Every time the project crosses a swim lane, there's a potential for
- 05:01 organizational and communication risk.
- 05:04 You use whichever risk identification technique you like and
- 05:08 that fits the culture of your organization and project.
- 05:11 The important thing is to identify all the threats and
- 05:15 opportunities to the project, so they can be analyzed and proactively managed.
Lesson notes are only available for subscribers.
PMI, PMP, CAPM and PMBOK are registered marks of the Project Management Institute, Inc.