Locked lesson.
About this lesson
The organization needs to establish a management discipline for selecting and approving projects.
Exercise files
Download this lesson’s related exercise files.
Project Selection and Approval.docx.docx60.2 KB Project Selection and Approval - Solution.docx.docx
59.1 KB
Quick reference
Project Selection and Approval
The organization needs to establish a management discipline for selecting and approving projects.
When to use
Projects should not be initiated without the appropriate stakeholders making a decision to devote resources to the project. At the time of project initiation, a project does not need to be selected for completion, but rather it can be selected to just proceed to the next phase. When a project is only approved for one phase, it must come back to the stakeholders for approval to proceed to the next phase.
Instructions
Stakeholders should be deciding whether to expend resources upon project activities. Typically they will be using a combination of criteria such as:
- Strategic alignment.
- Adequate Return on Investment (ROI) – both project and portfolio.
- Clear goals and objectives.
- Realistic and achievable project plan or project approach.
- Resources available to do the project work.
In most organizations, a Stage and Gate process is used to approve projects and periodically review progress to ensure that the project should be continued.
If an organization has never canceled a project, then either they are being much too conservative on project selection and planning, or they are wasting resources. There is enough uncertainty in project execution and the organizational environment changes often enough, that it is highly unlikely that every project stays within its boundaries and lives up to the original expectation.
Formal
A formal process is normally used for large projects or those involving the purchase of capital equipment. The formal process involves the review of the project charter or status by management and stakeholders. The stakeholders assess the project with respect to other projects and select projects that are most likely to meet the organizational objectives and for which they have resources. The stakeholders often review large projects several times during the life of the project.
Informal
Small projects are often approved by stakeholders at staff meetings or informal meetings where the manager of the resources directs the project team, or team leader, to “just do it.” Unless the project leader discovers a major risk or problem, they consider the project is approved and does not need to be reviewed again by the stakeholder.
Hints & tips
Canceling a project should not be viewed as a project management failure. If a project is no longer aligned with a changed organizational strategy, it should be canceled regardless of how well it was planned or executed.
Login to download- 00:04 Hi, I'm Ray Sheen.
- 00:05 I'd like to talk with you about project selection and approval, and in particular,
- 00:10 about some of the practices for deciding whether to do a project and
- 00:14 whether the organization is ready to start.
- 00:16 We've considered the requirements, the stakeholders, and the methodologies.
- 00:20 We now have a good understanding of what needs to be done, and
- 00:23 the approach that should be used.
- 00:25 It's time to decide, is this the right next project for the organization?
- 00:30 When discussing project selection, the key is to make sure that you've selected
- 00:35 the right project and not selected the wrong project.
- 00:38 It's as important to know when to say no as it is when to say yes.
- 00:43 The organization does not want to waste resources on an irrelevant or
- 00:47 ill-conceived project.
- 00:48 There are some criteria you can use to ensure that you are selecting the right
- 00:53 project.
- 00:53 First, make sure that the project is aligned with the strategy,
- 00:57 the project takes the organization in the direction that it needs to go.
- 01:01 In many organizations, a project ROI or return on investment is calculated
- 01:06 to ensure that the benefits offset the cost of the project.
- 01:10 Just because the topic is strategically aligned and
- 01:13 has a great potential benefits, it may not be the right time to initiate it.
- 01:18 For instance, if it is not yet well-defined, the goals, deliverables, and
- 01:22 boundaries aren't clear, there is some work to be done before full approval is
- 01:27 given, or the methodology needs to be an adaptive or iterative approach.
- 01:31 Also, before the organization should say yes,
- 01:34 there should be an idea about what they are committing to.
- 01:37 A high level budget and schedule should have been estimated.
- 01:40 This is not a detailed project plan,
- 01:42 that will come after the initial approval is given, and
- 01:45 the project manager can assemble the team and start that detailed planning.
- 01:50 The last consideration is the other projects that are in the pipeline.
- 01:54 This project may be a great idea, well-defined and understood, but
- 01:58 the organization is already over allocated on other projects,
- 02:02 adding one more is not helpful.
- 02:04 The project is not permanently cancelled but
- 02:06 the start date is delayed until there are adequate resources to do the work.
- 02:11 Let's look at some specific criteria used when selecting a project.
- 02:16 The project may be required because of compliance with changes of laws or
- 02:20 regulations.
- 02:21 When this is the case,
- 02:22 the organization may not have the option of saying no to the goal of the project,
- 02:26 but it can say no to a specific option for meeting the compliance requirements.
- 02:31 The key here is to select the best option, not just the first idea.
- 02:36 Many times projects are selected because of their strategic importance.
- 02:40 They may not have the best financial return in the near-term, but
- 02:44 they reposition the organization to better align with the strategy and
- 02:48 their completion enables other projects to be done.
- 02:51 When considering financial benefits, there are two ways to look at a project.
- 02:56 The first is how the project improves the entire portfolio of the business activity.
- 03:01 A specific project may only have a small ROI, but it becomes an enabler for
- 03:06 other projects and increases the ROI of the portfolio.
- 03:09 It may open a new market, expand a facility or capacity,
- 03:13 or provide a new system or technology.
- 03:15 The second perspective of financial return is the specific project return.
- 03:21 Hopefully, it has an excellent ROI,
- 03:23 the financial return more than offsets the project cost.
- 03:27 The final criteria is the project pipeline.
- 03:30 This can work both ways.
- 03:31 Sometimes we approve or accelerate a project to fill the pipeline and
- 03:35 keep the organization fully employed.
- 03:37 Other times, we delay or stop a project because there's not enough resources or
- 03:42 to prevent a conflict in a particular organization or facility.
- 03:46 Consider both the total resources and the potential collision of multiple
- 03:50 projects hitting the same milestone at the same time.
- 03:54 Once we've decided to move forward,
- 03:56 we now need to understand how we formally approve the project.
- 04:01 Every organization has a different process.
- 04:03 It may vary depending upon the type of project.
- 04:06 While every organization is unique,
- 04:08 there are a few best practices that we can look at.
- 04:10 Let's talk about the formal approach first.
- 04:13 A formal approach normally follows a formal review.
- 04:16 This is usually based upon the review of a project charter by an executive
- 04:20 management team.
- 04:21 The executives are often reviewing many project proposals,
- 04:25 they prioritize the projects, and based upon the resources available,
- 04:29 will find the highest priorities.
- 04:31 Depending upon the organization's project management methodology and the lifecycle,
- 04:36 they may fully fund the project or only fund the first few phases,
- 04:39 in which case the project must come back with the results of the work that they've
- 04:43 done to receive the additional funding to complete the project.
- 04:47 The executives may also impose constraints on the project, such as the methodology
- 04:51 the team must follow or the timing and availability of resources.
- 04:55 Formal approval is great when we have it, and is usually formally documented by
- 05:00 signing the charter or some other project authorization form.
- 05:04 However, many projects are informally approved.
- 05:06 This is usually done in the case of small, quick, or ambiguous projects.
- 05:11 These approvals may happen at a staff meeting or even a hallway conversation.
- 05:15 There's still a review of the charter or the project approach although often
- 05:20 the charter is just an informal list of the project W's, the what, who, why, when,
- 05:24 how, and where of the project boundaries.
- 05:27 The approval is often given in an informal manner,
- 05:30 with the project leader being told to just go do it.
- 05:33 Even when that's the case, I recommend that a follow-up email be sent,
- 05:37 documenting the approval.
- 05:39 A difficulty with informal approval for cross-functional projects is that
- 05:43 the other departments may not be aware of the need for their support.
- 05:47 The project leader must identify and recruit the resources that are needed for
- 05:50 the project.
- 05:51 If the project leader runs into problems getting those resources, he or
- 05:55 she must go back to the original stakeholder to get further guidance for
- 05:59 direction and to get their buy-in and
- 06:01 support to ensure that they can get the resources that are required.
- 06:05 Whether it's a formal approval or an informal approval,
- 06:08 it's important that the organization knows what projects have been selected and why.
- 06:14 It can then support those projects to successful conclusion.
Lesson notes are only available for subscribers.
PMI, PMP, CAPM and PMBOK are registered marks of the Project Management Institute, Inc.