Locked lesson.
About this lesson
All project risks are not equal in their effect on a project. Project risks that have been identified are prioritized using qualitative techniques such as the Risk Matrix.
Exercise files
Download this lesson’s related exercise files.
Risk Matrix.docx.docx62.7 KB Risk Matrix - Solution.docx.docx
108.7 KB
Quick reference
Risk Matrix
Project risks are not equal in their effect on a project. Project risks that have been identified are prioritized using qualitative techniques such as the Risk Matrix.
When to use
Once project risks have been identified, they should be entered onto a matrix or qualitative assessment and prioritized for further action. As long as there are open risks on the project, a risk matrix should be used.
Instructions
- Determine the size of the matrix – the most commonly used size is 3 X 3. But I have worked with 4 X 4, 5 X 5, and even a 5 X 10 that combined positive and negative risk in one matrix.
- Normally probability is set as the vertical axis. The scale is either low to high or it is set with probability values
- Normally project impact is set as the horizontal axis. The scale is either low to high or an impact in terms of money or time is set.
- For each risk, place it in the correct spot on the matrix based upon the probability that the risk will occur and the impact to the project if it does occur.
- I use recent relevant experience on similar projects to assess the probability. If it happened on each of the last five projects, the probability is high that it will occur again. If it hasn’t happened on any of the last five projects, the probability is low.
- I base the impact assessment on the current project plan. Assuming the risk occurs, what does it do to the plan and the ability to achieve the project objectives? Is it a minor irritant or does the plan already account for the risk – then the impact is low. Does it require a totally new approach and a project rebaseline – then the impact is high.
- Periodically update the risks as more information becomes available and as events occur within the project.
- If you implement risk mitigation or risk response action in the project, the risk will normally be repositioned in the matrix – either the probability is reduced or the impact is decreased.
- If you accept a challenge or change to project objectives (finish one month sooner) normally some risks will need to change position, either the probability increases or the impact increases.
- Based upon the location of the risk in the matrix, the risk often receives a color code. Risk with high probability and high impact are red. Risks with low probability and impact receive a color code of green. Risks in the middle receive a color code of yellow.
- 00:04 Hello, I'm Ray Sheen, and
- 00:06 I like to talk about analyzing risks in order to prioritize them.
- 00:09 We call this qualitative risk analysis, and
- 00:12 our primary tool to do this is the risk matrix.
- 00:15 Most organizations are operating with limited time and resources, so
- 00:20 it's important to minimize threat risks and maximize opportunity risks.
- 00:25 However, since there are constraints, you can't minimize all threats and
- 00:30 take advantage of all opportunities.
- 00:32 And it's probably no surprise that some risks will have a different impact
- 00:36 than others.
- 00:36 Therefore, you need to prioritize which risks to address.
- 00:40 This prioritization is known as qualitative risk analysis.
- 00:44 In addition, as industry and organizational conditions change, and
- 00:48 as elements of the project plan need to change,
- 00:51 the risk priority often changes throughout the life of the project.
- 00:55 As a project manager, you decide which risks are critical threats and
- 00:59 take action to eliminate or prepare for them.
- 01:02 Also, you need to identify which opportunities could have the biggest
- 01:06 impact on the project, and take advantage of those.
- 01:09 Qualitative risk analysis provides focus on these critical risks.
- 01:15 Qualitative risk analysis normally results in placing risks into one of three
- 01:19 categories that often use the stoplight colors to segregate them.
- 01:23 There's the red light.
- 01:25 The red risks are large critical risks that are likely to cause significant
- 01:30 disruption and problems, or significant improvement to the project goals.
- 01:34 If it is a negative risk, the risk could ultimately doom the project to failure.
- 01:40 These risks are likely to happen, and
- 01:42 they will prevent the project from achieving all its goals and objectives.
- 01:46 Next are the yellow risks.
- 01:48 These are cautionary risks.
- 01:50 They're manageable, but they require a lot of effort to manage them.
- 01:54 They must be closely monitored, possibly micromanaged.
- 01:58 They do cause some disruption, but not to the level of project failure.
- 02:02 Finally, there are the green risks.
- 02:04 These risks are not a significant issue on the project.
- 02:07 Many times, the green risks are a red or yellow risk that has been mitigated.
- 02:12 There's still an issue, an irritant, but because of the mitigation actions,
- 02:16 they will not have a significant impact on the project any longer.
- 02:20 The primary technique used for determining the red, yellow,
- 02:24 green status of risks is the risk matrix.
- 02:27 This is considered a qualitative technique because it's not meant to involve
- 02:32 in-depth testing or analysis.
- 02:34 The tool's a matrix, and
- 02:35 each risk will be placed in the matrix at the appropriate location.
- 02:39 One side of the matrix is Probability.
- 02:42 I assess the probability of a risk by considering how frequently it occurred
- 02:47 on the last five or six similar projects.
- 02:49 If it happened on all of them or
- 02:52 almost all of them, the probability is high.
- 02:57 If it didn't happen at all, then the probability is low.
- 02:58 When I look at the Impact side, I consider the existing project plan or
- 03:02 intended approach if the plan is not yet finished.
- 03:05 And I consider the project goal or objectives.
- 03:09 I ask the question what if this happens on this project?
- 03:13 Does that impact the goals or objectives of the project?
- 03:16 And if so, by how much?
- 03:18 A matrix can be created by analyzing opportunities or threats.
- 03:23 Normally, there's a matrix created for each.
- 03:26 Although, I have seen a matrix that tried to combine the two.
- 03:29 Personally, I thought it was kind of clunky, and
- 03:32 I recommend using two separate matrices.
- 03:34 Finally, the size of the matrix can vary.
- 03:37 I've seen 3 by 3s, 4 by 4s, and 5 by 5s.
- 03:41 Any of those will work.
- 03:43 Use the one your organization has adopted or
- 03:46 the one that suits your personal preferences.
- 03:48 The last point I want to make about qualitative risk analysis and
- 03:52 the risk matrix is that it is meant to be a fast and easy approach to filter risks.
- 03:57 The risks that end up in our red zone,
- 04:00 you will normally do in a more in-depth analysis to understand and control.
- 04:04 But the creation of this matrix should be fast.
- 04:08 That leads us to a comment on the rating scales on the risk matrix.
- 04:12 The most common method is to use some type of quantitative scale even though
- 04:17 the risk matrix is actually a qualitative technique.
- 04:21 This is one that I pulled from one of my clients who use a 5 by 5 matrix.
- 04:25 The Impact scale is usually in money, but
- 04:28 I've occasionally seen it in units of time.
- 04:30 I personally don't like to use the quantitative scale because I find
- 04:35 people start arguing over whether an impact is going to be $9,999 or
- 04:41 $10,001 as they try to force a risk into a particular color.
- 04:46 If you're using a quantitative scale, try to relate your risk to something that
- 04:51 actually happened on another project in order to quantify your impact.
- 04:55 I prefer to use a qualitative scale such as this one, which is for a 3 by 3 matrix.
- 05:02 In this case,
- 05:03 we rely on the subject matter experts to help us assign the correct rating.
- 05:07 One more point about the value of a risk matrix.
- 05:09 I've had projects where stakeholders were upset with the team and
- 05:13 felt that they were being too negative when they presented their list of risks.
- 05:17 By showing them the risk matrix,
- 05:19 the team is able to explain why they think a particular risk is red or yellow.
- 05:24 The matrix forces the stakeholders to consider the probability and
- 05:28 the impact on this project, not just an emotional response when prioritizing risk.
- 05:33 Risk prioritization is an important role of project management.
- 05:37 Project time and resources are constrained.
- 05:40 Risks must be prioritized to make effective use of the scarce project
- 05:45 resources.
Lesson notes are only available for subscribers.
PMI, PMP, CAPM and PMBOK are registered marks of the Project Management Institute, Inc.