Locked lesson.
About this lesson
In addition to completing the project goals and objectives, an attribute of project performance is the performance of the members of the project team. Each team member should have continued to develop their own skills and leadership.
Exercise files
Download this lesson’s related exercise files.
Verify Performance Improvement Exercise.docx61.7 KB Verify Performance Improvement Exercise Solution.docx
61.2 KB
Quick reference
Verify Performance Improvement
In addition to completing the project goals and objectives, an attribute of project performance is the performance of the members of the project team. Each team member should have continued to develop their own skills and leadership.
When to use
On one hand, the project leader and core team members should always be tracking the performance of team members and providing both positive and negative feedback. In addition, at the end of the project, or after each phase on large complex projects the project leader should provide formal feedback on personal performance.
Instructions
An important principle to recognize when verifying personal performance and improvement is the difference between responsibility and accountability. Responsibility is something that is either given to an individual or assumed by the individual so that they can accomplish something. It is forward-looking. Accountability is backward-looking. It is the acknowledgment of who performed in a manner to that created the result being discussed. Accountability can be both positive and negative. A person can be accountable for having created a very good result or a very bad result.
Responsibility without authority can lead to inefficient and irresponsible behavior. It doesn’t matter what a person does, they won’t be held accountable. But at the same time accountability without responsibility is frustrating and can cause someone to choke with fear. Even though they have no influence over a situation, they are being held accountable. Ideally, you want responsibility and accountability to be aligned. Someone acknowledges that they will be responsible for the results in a certain area of project performance and when the results come in, they are held accountable for them. When evaluating personal performance improvement, be sure that you are matching accountability with the actual responsibility the person was either given or had assumed.
The framework shown below is a good model to follow when conducting formal appraisals. It starts with a plan. The individual should have a performance plan that includes some personal development. Make sure they have the responsibility necessary to implement the plan. The next step is to monitor performance. During this time, give real-time feedback on both what someone is doing well and areas for improvement. When it becomes time for the review, gather data from your observations and other inputs. Prepare a formal performance feedback report to the individual -again highlighting both positive and negative performance and including specific instances. The last step is just as important as the other three, that is the reward and incentives. Rewarding good performance not only encourages the one who gets the reward, but it also sets a positive tone on the team that good performance is noticed and appreciated.
Finally some principles on giving and receiving feedback. When giving feedback:
- Be timely
- Include positives with negatives
- Be prepared
- Be regular
- Be focused
- Provide suggestions
- Be specific
- Follow up
When receiving feedback:
- Check your ego at the door
- Keep an open mind
- It’s less about you and more about the team or organization
- Breathe
- Take five minutes to think before you react
- Thank them
- Prioritize your actions
Hints & tips
- Everyone should be seeking to grow and develop. Encourage this behavior. Our industry and society are changing rapidly and you must be constantly learning just to stay caught up.
- Some individuals are paranoid about getting feedback. Take your time and be sure you have thought out what you will say and the example you will use to illustrate both positive and negative performance.
- 00:04 Hi, this is Ray Sheen again.
- 00:05 Here, we've been talking a lot about project objectives and
- 00:08 project performance.
- 00:09 But I do want to take a few minutes and
- 00:11 discuss the performance of project team members.
- 00:14 Our desire is to see all of our team members improve their
- 00:17 performance over the life of the project.
- 00:20 We're dealing with project execution and control in this course, and that means
- 00:24 that we're dealing to a great degree with the performance of individuals.
- 00:28 To put things in context, I want to discuss responsibility and accountability,
- 00:33 especially as they apply to project work.
- 00:35 Let me start by saying that in the ideal condition, responsibility and
- 00:39 accountability are aligned.
- 00:41 The person responsible for a portion of the project work is held accountable for
- 00:45 how well that work is done.
- 00:47 And someone who is being held accountable for a project deliverable being correct
- 00:51 has the responsibility to see that the work was done to make it so.
- 00:55 It may be of help to define our terms.
- 00:57 Responsibilities sets expectations for what will be done.
- 01:01 Responsibility for a task or activity can be assigned to an individual or
- 01:05 an individual can volunteer and assume that responsibility.
- 01:08 Either way, there's a commitment to get something done right in the future.
- 01:14 Accountability is after the fact, it's based on what has happened.
- 01:18 And it's designated to the individual or
- 01:20 agent who was the major actor leading to the project result.
- 01:24 And since accountability is looking at the past,
- 01:27 it cannot be transferred to others, nor can someone volunteer to take it up.
- 01:32 Accountability is fixed the moment the project event happened, or did not happen.
- 01:38 It is what is.
- 01:40 Responsibility though, can change hands.
- 01:43 So let's consider a few problems.
- 01:45 Responsibility without accountability leads to inefficient or
- 01:50 even irresponsible behavior.
- 01:52 Someone can do whatever they want and
- 01:55 not have to take ownership for what has happened.
- 01:58 But there's also a problem with accountability and no responsibility.
- 02:02 A person is blamed or credited for
- 02:04 a project event even though they were not in the position to control the event.
- 02:08 This will often lead to fear and frustration.
- 02:11 It doesn't matter what the person does, they will still need to answer for
- 02:16 the project impact from the event.
- 02:18 Assuming that you have aligned responsibility and accountability,
- 02:22 now it's time to evaluate performance.
- 02:24 I like to use this model for team member performance and evaluation.
- 02:28 One reason I like to use it is it closely follows
- 02:30 the Plan-Do-Check-Act Shewhart Cycle approach that we use with our
- 02:34 continuous improvement process.
- 02:36 The first step is to plan.
- 02:38 This includes the project planning of aligning a person's responsibilities with
- 02:42 the goals of the project.
- 02:44 It also includes any planned improvement activities that the individual is
- 02:48 undertaking.
- 02:49 Next is to monitor the individual and their performance.
- 02:53 As you observe the individual, feel free to give feedback.
- 02:56 Don't wait until the end of the performance appraisal period before
- 03:00 mentioning an issue.
- 03:01 Talking about the performance and providing feedback when you see it helps
- 03:05 the individual make immediate changes while still doing project work.
- 03:09 Review step is just that.
- 03:11 Review with other stakeholders to gather additional information on the individual's
- 03:16 performance.
- 03:16 This is normally where the formal appraisal process kicks in.
- 03:21 Of course, use whatever systems your organization uses for
- 03:25 performance appraisal, be they written, online or face to face.
- 03:29 Finally, we get to the rewards portion of the process.
- 03:32 The rewards may be monetary, it may be recognition.
- 03:36 It could be promotion, it could be almost anything.
- 03:39 But make sure it's appropriate for the nature of the performance.
- 03:41 Lavish awards for poor performance anger the team.
- 03:45 But no rewards for outstanding performance will discourage the team.
- 03:49 Since feedback is so important on our performance review,
- 03:53 let's take a moment discussing how we get and receive feedback.
- 03:57 Let's start with some basic principles about giving feedback.
- 04:00 First, be timely.
- 04:02 You want the feedback to come right after the action that you will be discussing.
- 04:06 And make sure you're focused on the individual.
- 04:08 Don't be reading text or carrying on a second conversation at the same time.
- 04:13 I recommend you include both positive and negative comments when giving feedback.
- 04:17 And be specific, you don't want the person to be confused about what they did right
- 04:21 or what they need to improve.
- 04:23 So that means that you should have a suggestion for
- 04:25 what they should be doing next.
- 04:27 All this means that you need to be prepared.
- 04:30 Don't do formal feedback in an impromptu matter.
- 04:33 They can convey that it's just not important enough to plan.
- 04:36 Now, I don't mean that you can't compliment or
- 04:39 reprove someone when being caught in an act of doing something right or wrong.
- 04:43 But formal feedback should be regularly planned and prepared for.
- 04:47 Also, if you make suggestions for improvement and they agree to it,
- 04:51 it's okay to follow up with them and ask how it's going.
- 04:55 And just as you should be providing feedback for your team members on
- 04:58 a regular basis, you'll likely be getting feedback yourself.
- 05:02 And here are a few principles to follow.
- 05:04 First, check your ego at the door.
- 05:07 Don't let positive feedback puff you up, and
- 05:09 don't take negative feedback as a personal attack.
- 05:12 Keep an open mind and listen to what is being said.
- 05:15 A good rule of thumb is to put all the feedback in the team and
- 05:18 organizational context.
- 05:20 It's not about you, it's about the team performance.
- 05:23 Chances are, that is the context the observations are made in to begin with.
- 05:28 So the impact on the team and organization is what is the uppermost in the mind of
- 05:32 the person giving you the feedback.
- 05:34 If you find yourself becoming defensive, don't argue.
- 05:38 Take a few breaths, calm yourself,
- 05:40 wait a few minutes to digest the information before you react.
- 05:44 In an earlier course, we discussed emotional intelligence.
- 05:47 This is the time to use it on yourself.
- 05:50 Once you're calm, thank them for the feedback and
- 05:52 then decide what actions that you'll take in response to it.
- 05:55 Determine how you'll proceed on your personal continuous improvement journey.
- 06:00 A system and process for
- 06:02 verifying personal performance, both yours and your team members,
- 06:06 will accelerate continuous improvement at all levels of your organization.
Lesson notes are only available for subscribers.
PMI, PMP, CAPM and PMBOK are registered marks of the Project Management Institute, Inc.