Locked lesson.
About this lesson
The concurrent project management methodology is a collaborative approach. It can significantly accelerate a project as compared to the sequential approach, but it is much more difficult to project manage.
Exercise files
Download this lesson’s related exercise files.
Concurrent Methodology.docx59.4 KB Concurrent Methodology - Solution.docx
61.1 KB
Quick reference
Concurrent Methodology
The concurrent project management methodology is a collaborative approach. It can significantly accelerate a project as compared to the sequential approach, but it is much more difficult to project manage.
When to Use Concurrent Methodology
The concurrent approach can work well with large complex projects that are under stringent time constraints. It works best when you are able to create a co-located or at least closely located Core Team. It requires project Core Team members to have strong technical and leadership skills. If your organization fits these criteria, the concurrent approach is appropriate.
Instructions
The concurrent methodology maintains functional specialization, but it encourages collaboration. The project activity between functions is intentionally overlapped so that two or more functions are working concurrently on the same aspect of the project. This collaboration can lead to a lower cost and better performing solution. However, it is also much more difficult to keep activities in sync and to negotiate between the often competing needs and desires of the functions. An illustration of this approach is shown below for a generic software development project.
This approach relies on a cross functional Core Team that manages the project. The project manager role is one of facilitating and coordinating the Core Team as they plan and manage the project. Each Core Team member has a voice so both internal and external customer needs are considered when managing the project. This team resolves the project issues in a manner that is best for the business, not just one function.
The advantages of this approach are related to the fact that this approach is focused on communication. This leads to better handoffs between team members and better understanding of the customer needs and expectations. Issue resolution considers the entire business not just one function which often leads to lower cost and better quality solutions. Finally, when the approach is working well, this will be 40% faster than the sequential approach.
However, there are also some significant challenges when using this approach. It is management by committee and if the committee members do not work well together, it can turn into disaster. The project management effort is more difficult because there are so many activities happening at the same time. These require good up-front planning and close monitoring of progress.
Another problem that sometimes arises is that there is a high level of rework of prototypes and costs due to changes. This is due to the iterative nature of the work. For organizations that were accustomed to sequential where this cost is often very low, it can be a surprise. The overall project cost will be less, but this one set of accounts will be higher. The other challenge will occur when an organization is resource constrained, such as a start-up. Compressing the work to complete in 40% less time did not eliminate 40% of the work, therefore there will be more people working on the project at one time. If there are not enough resources available, the advantages of concurrency are lost.
Hints and Tips
- The most difficult project management activity in this approach is scheduling. I encourage project managers to use a network diagram schedule to understand the interdependencies.
- Project Core Team members must be both technical experts and have strong cooperative leadership qualities. They must lead their function to support the project and lead the project to ensure functional standards are maintained.
Lesson notes are only available for subscribers.
PMI, PMP, CAPM and PMBOK are registered marks of the Project Management Institute, Inc.