Locked lesson.
About this lesson
The final four steps of the Design FMEA are where the assessment happens. These steps do the original analysis and manage the mitigation of high risk failures.
Exercise files
Download this lesson’s related exercise files.
Design FMEA Analysis.docx61.2 KB Design FMEA Analysis - Solution.docx
61.9 KB
Quick reference
Design FMEA Analysis Steps
The last four steps of the Design FMEA process are the ones where the analysis is accomplished. These are the steps that determine the technical design risk.
When to use
Whenever a Design FMEA is conducted, the analysis steps must be completed. After the first three steps are done, the remaining four steps can be completed. These steps must be completed in the order indicated.
Instructions
The heart of the Design FMEA is the analysis and these steps provide direction for how to do that analysis. These steps complete each of the columns on the Design FMEA form.
Step 4. Identify functions and failure modes
Use the Block Diagram from Step 3 to list all the functions for each part or component that are included in this Design FMEA. Each function should be on a separate line. For each function, list all applicable failure modes. There should be one failure mode on each line of the Design FMEA form. If a function has multiple failure modes, add additional lines below the line listing the function.
Step 5. Analyse failures
For each failure mode, describe the effect of that failure on product performance. Then score the severity of that effect. Next list the possible causes of that failure mode. If there is more than one cause, list each cause on a separate line. Now score the probability of occurrence of that cause for this product in its intended application. Finally, describe the design control process based upon the product development procedure that would uncover this failure mode in this design. Score the detection capability.
Step 6. Implement mitigation plan
The three scores from Step 5 are multiplied together to get a Risk Priority Number or RPN. When this value exceeds the organizational threshold, a mitigation action should be taken. Typical actions are:
- Design change to lower the severity (safety covers, or less volatile materials)
- Design change to lower occurrence (more robust technology or design)
- Development process change to improve detection (additional testing or analysis)
After a mitigation is completed, the failure mode is rescored. Depending upon the design change, new failure modes may have been introduced and these should also be analysed.
Step 7. Document analysis
The Design FMEA is placed under revision control and maintained as part of the design documentation. It should be revised whenever there is a change to the design, a change to functions the product is intended to perform, or if new information becomes available concerning the probability of occurrence of failure modes.
Hints & tips
- These steps are the focus of the Design FMEA. They will likely take the most time and effort to complete.
- The goal is to identify technical risk, so list all functions and failure modes, not just a minimal set in order to say you did a Design FMEA. I was reviewing the development process for an organization one time and saw a Design FMEA for a complex system with dozens of components and numerous functions that only listed three failure modes, all of which were rated as very low and not requiring mitigation. Yet, the reason I was reviewing the procedure was because that product (and several others) were experiencing major production and field failure problems. The Design FMEA they completed was worthless since it overlooked 90% of the failure modes. Use the Design FMEA for what it was intended – to identify technical risk during the design process, so that risk can be mitigated to an acceptable level.
- Include Desing FMEA revisions in the change control process for design documentation. Make it a required submittal before any design change can be approved.
Lesson notes are only available for subscribers.
PMI, PMP, CAPM and PMBOK are registered marks of the Project Management Institute, Inc.